zoloft effexor compared lasix sulfa interaction no follicles on clomid magnesium zoloft methocarbamol 750 mg directions cialis mejora la circulacion lisinopril allergy medicine how to start taking synthroid premarin aches teva acyclovir ingredients sildenafil es de venta libre en argentina bactrim and amoxicillin interaction sildenafil ejercicio metoprolol vs atenolol dosing ciprofloxacin tablets ip 500mg uses estradiol level lh surge take fluconazole 3 doses 50mg high doses of bupropion erythromycin suspencio oral 250mg para quem serve adalat pediatric dose viagra paypal checkout prednisone to treat cystic acne zoloft effects on period zoloft withdrawal diarrhea viagra frauen erfahrungsberichte la viagra para diabeticos cialis donde comprar en chile levitra type products do doxycycline side effects ciprofloxacin dosage range dfbx diet pill what time should you take plavix was kostet cymbalta 60 mg 15 mg of remeron for imsomnia and anxiety will i sleep does metformin help in ovulation uk ciproxin 500 need receipt paxil claim center lyme disease treated with doxycycline propranolol hypertension celexa and nicotine paxil side effects for elderly when did you notice propecia working finasteride dosage 5mg week how long do you take lipitor como debo tomar misoprostol para abortar low dose tamoxifen breast cancer doxycycline 8 months metoprolol succinate exercise montelukast dosis can you take hydrochlorothiazide pills while pregnant pastilla priligy en estados unidos priapus viagra selsun blue or nizoral micardis 88 mgs con 12.5 hct seroquel withdrawal hallucinations septra double stranded bactrim pronunciation clomid 10mg after eating viagra girl can get pregnant puedo morir por tomar cytotec 4 x 4 viagra how can i get the viagra without a doctor saw palmetto as effective as finasteride amoxicillin 100 mg n1 does cialis improve sperm count metronidazole in saline why give prednisone to cancer patients bactrim ds and indigestion buy tamoxifen from uk buy atomoxetine 60mg canada bilateral mastectomy and tamoxifen cialis 80 mg tadalafil when does wellbutrin side effects go away can you control erections on cialis taking paroxetine once how to take rogaine and propecia together tetracycline side effects sweating tapering prednisone and side effects mobi mobicam ultra 900 mhz monitoring system danimarca cipro under 19 harga obat levitra 20mg cialis cura a impotencia does clomid increase antral follicle count does synthroid have iodine in it viagra enteric coating elavil 10mg would sell on the streets what is the drug tenormin used for clomid online canada no prescription cozaar price malaysia clopidogrel match best diet pill selling neurontin para el cancer vigora 100 mg hindi nexium esophagus cancer para que es el aldactone 25 mg is metformin liver toxic bactrim sciroppo dosaggio lipitor medsafe nz 100 ml viagra how long do they take to work abilify ahdistus is valtrex crushable proscar apteka embarazo tomando estradiol when was lexapro introduced zithromax and ortho tri cyclen allegra efficacy max time to fuck using viagra how many celexa would it take to overdose effectiveness of prednisone for eczema rating levitra versus viagra nhs liquid gabapentin costs minoxidil finasteride y ketoconazol ventolin diskus posologie every other day finasteride cause acne anastrozole tamoxifen breast cancer renal lasix scan cpt code how long is erythromycin good for metformin and polycystic ovaries amlodipine misselijk tetracycline dosage for infection levaquin bk virus sertraline allergy amlodipine tablets stability ampicillin may treat duloxetine chronic back pain china viagra manufacturer nitroglycerin price in india allergic to cialis viagra buch can amoxicillin affect cerazette una canzone allegra e simpatica prodam viagra difference between atenolol and carvedilol zovirax anwenden amitriptyline for pain does it work saxagliptin metformin spc nortriptyline neuropathic pain prednisone dogs lyme disease zovirax 800 mg online india como prescrever aciclovir pomada tallinna viagra clomid ai or serm accutane anavar metoprolol fachinfo take fluconazole tablets test tadalafil roaccutane 20mg image adderall cialis viagara buspirone geriatric sachet of viagra cialis best price u.s. viagra valium premature ejaculation diflucan treatment rash what is zyprexa 10mg used for amoxicillin reaction in adults tetracycline dental uses diet loss pill weight xenical para que sirve la capsula amoxil ciprofloxacin 250 mg order 500 mg metronidazole safe while pregnant price of one cialis at walgreens viagra in germany for man acyclovir dieu tri zona blood pressure medicine and cialis synthroid ultram avodart 0.5 mg.30 yumusak kapsul etken maddesi strattera 80mg same as adderall albuterol vs xopenex body building keflex and yasmin walmart and lipitor generic when should ventolin be used buspirone hcl tab 5mg aap ki adalat wiki riesgos del celecoxib aciclovir sirve para hpv aldactone uso veterinario formule chimique viagra paroxetine apotex prix propranolol 2g estradiol para engrosar endometrio tadalafil benign prostatic hyperplasia amoxicillin in renal disease effects of wellbutrin xl and alcohol zyprexa seroquel interaction khasiat obat glucophage 850mg metformin hcl long term effects of using neurontin foods you can eat with ciprofloxacin flomax semen what are the effects of not taking synthroid dose flagyl cachorro mobiclic site officiel pfizer viagra kaufen rezeptfrei cialis buy singapore does walmart insurance cover viagra headache while taking valtrex image valtrex pill withdrawal side effects from paxil dosing instruction for prednisone pablo tablet is antibiotic or not two old papy liked viagra part 1 buspar and period nizoral better than minoxidil wellbutrin withdrawal restless legs wellbutrin and mirapex flagyl kruidvat lexapro or paxil cr medicamentul abilify quero parar de tomar cymbalta does azithromycin work with alcohol augmentin uccelli azithromycin nosebleed azithromycin dizzy side effects nizoral safe for colored hair do you need a prescription for viagra in tijuana can avodart cause prostate cancer how dangerous is lipitor metronidazole pill look like verapamil transdermal gel cost cialis ankara da nerde how many viagras can i take in 24 hours ivermectin method should i stop cialis before sugery finpecia or finax honeymoon and levitra overdose de labilify topiramate vicodin celexa 20 mg while pregnant bcs category of montelukast gonal and clomid viagra y oxido nitrico tetracycline preparation ethanol premarin cream and vivelle dot iv lasix was started off season zoloft better in morning or night para que serve orlistat 1.20 prilosec cipro interaction efectos adversos ciprofloxacina doxycycline mono for chlamydia zoloft diverticulitis antibiotic doxycycline for dogs augmentin allattamento al seno inderal la and exercise topamax dosage migraine g 45 500 metformin paroxetine therapeutic range ampicillin apteka topamax bone density propranolol ringing in ears amoxicillin oder doxycyclin clopidogrel plavix prezzo ventolin cough syrup for toddlers keflex til hund dosering is viagra over the counter in israel spironolactone therapeutic effect is budesonide and albuterol the same thing what happens when you drink alcohol on azithromycin sevrage du seroquel norvasc back pain can cialis loses its effect cheap viagra pakistan erythromycin garlic olanzapine and ovulation ampicillin for back acne ciprofloxacino mediplus what is the difference between zoloft and elavil viagra ndc code why does prednisone cause heartburn seroquel xr with ambien amoxicillin wechselwirkungen anderen medikamenten finasteride usp genesis usage n side effects for hair pil cytotec di terengganu zyban dergboadre dosage clomid para homens como tomar can i take amoxicillin that is old allopurinol in gout flare symptoms when starting zoloft converting levothyroxine to naturethroid allegra direct troy levothyroxine response time strattera dose to weight ratio plavix pharmacare can you take prozac trazodone and remorin together flomax and uroxatral que efecto causa la viagra en las mujeres viagra kaufen ohne rezept bei den tschechen discount viagra 10 pack generic dosis ciprofloxacina iv ni?os cephalexin oral antibiotic propranolol and citalopram do they work together cialis 100mg cena xenical cardapio does it matter to take two cialis metformin empty stomach side effects of hoodia diet pills ondansetron in cancer can i take apple cider vinegar and metformin atenolol smell cual es el precio del orlistat como trabaja la viagra generic cialis prices in australia viral keratitis acyclovir does hydrochlorothiazide work right away cialis 100 pill ofloxacin otic solution ear drops ritenzione idrica rimedi lasix zovirax herpesztapasz viagra baownbeuv australia zoloft pseudoephedrine interaction zithromax and zomig azithromycin hikma offentlighetsprincipen och allm?nna handlingar healthcare that covers propecia celebrex for patellar tendonitis prednisone for hip bursitis cialis 50 mg 30 tablet metronidazole cold medicine isotretinoina liquido how long cialis 5 mg last para que sirve doxycycline monohydrate 100 mg capsule allegra chiara moda ro accutane for rosacea is viagra safe with sustiva metronidazole for giardia in humans metformin and blurry vision sonogram images on clomid plavix myelogram estrace cream walmart tamoxifen affect period can cephalexin cause acne riteaid cost of cialis for daily use atorvastatin liquid form cost estrace ivf tablets how long do you take tamoxifen dosis recomendada de zovirax taux oestradiol haut abra brand viagra efectos adversos aldactone orlistat mais barato is cialis really good francis allegra strattera of rilatine buspirone treatment cerebellar ataxia prednisone for arthritis pain prednisone dosage pack tamoxifeno rol ans nizoral shampoo voor honden drug interactions of quetiapine amoxicilline teva 500 mg bijsluiter facial flushing cymbalta rash keeps coming back after prednisone lamisil works best amoxicillin 50 mg feel light headed montelukast pregnant cialis and metfotmin side effects of 80mg per day of nexium windmills hotel cipro is zestril a beta blocker linezolid bag compatibility doxycycline single dose for lyme disease cialis pik.ba diflucan receta gabapentin cough side effect metformin wann normaler zyklus amitriptyline appetite keflex intravenous augmentin treats what infections tamoxifeno bifosfonatos doxycycline rash can we crush synthroid plavix menstrual bleeding shuangbao viagra tablets information metronidazole and alcohol nausea prednisone rib pain viagra for sale co za lasix pregnant women amitriptyline missed dose side effects alternative to propecia epistane mixed withpescription prednisone is 2.5 mg of lexapro therapeutic pamelor medication migraine ondansetron and long qt propranolol vision problems is metronidazole tablets used for chlamydia maximum allowable dose of cialis isotretinoin generic names dosis y via de administracion del aciclovir where to buy clomid without prescription in kenya generic manufacturers of tamoxifen unterschied zwischen tamoxifen und aromasin clomid pressure pain how long does it take cytotec to induce labor formula estrutural tamoxifeno how long for propecia sides to go away lasix uses side effects sildenafil neuraxpharm wirkung cymbalta comprar com desconto azithromycin teva alcohol neurontin grapefruit juice topamax feel good can withdraw from paroxetine cause depersonalization zovirax oftalmic ciproxina xr 500 o que ? tamoxifeno citrato misoprostol for induction of labour at term aciclovir o tromantadina ondansetron price at walmart paxil horrible drug dbol tamoxifen phenergan dose for dogs harga obat cytotec asli how 2 mke female viagra at hme fsh i estradiol a menopauza lisinopril half life 40 mg dosis ciprofloxacina neumonia effexor nexium resistance to azithromycin does levitra delay ejaculation metformin tablets for type 2 diabetes se puede tomar orlistat y metformina juntas puedo tomar cerveza y cialis nolvadex arimidex bloat lexapro composicion best way to take wellbutrin sr ciprofloxacin bactericidal bacteriostatic which one is cheaper cialis or viagra how many viagra can one take tamoxifen consumed allegra 180 mg for hives sinus infection prednisone short duration solution to being unable to ejaculate taking cialis what day do you ovulate on clomid 2 6 cheratussin ac azithromycin active ingredients in acyclovir dutasteride and slidenofil dr allegra cedar knolls dostinex e seno dolente doxycycline 500mg cylmidia amoxicillin compared to keflex gabapentin side effects chest pain terbinafine heart disease is zithromax used for stds american pharmacy viagra cipro ve hamilelik como pedir misoprostol alfabeto cipro ciprofloxacino para infeccion en la piel tesimonials men taking 40 mg of cialis does dosage of viagra matter cipla ltd products viagra zithromax erk?ltung can take 2 diflucan how much acyclovir for shingles side effects of seroquel herpes labial tratamento aciclovir comprimido sildenafil citrate reaction time losing weight on lopressor will seroquel get me to sleep zyban sustained release tablets can ivermectin be used for dogs acyclovir and olive leaf will bactrim treat acne modello prescrizione viagra zyprexa solr nifedipine vs nifedical finasteride sistema nervoso baclofen buy online chlamydia inital treatment failure with azithromycin how does metformin lower testosterone 10 mg celexa and weight gain doxycycline 100 side effects in dogs hyperhidrosis treatment propranolol adalat sony 26th march periactin prescription frequent periods on spironolactone when not to take seroquel sildenafil baownbeuv overnight anafranil avec alcool antidepressants for weight loss onde comprar o clomid amitriptyline sadness how long until ciprodex works atenolol bertibarots price can u take prozac and zoloft preco do viagra using diflucan while pregnant finasteride propecia vorher nachher cialis how to buy levaquin poisoning cure vitamins cialis kamagra vanilla flavour how long does propecia take to stop hair loss flomax contents tab acyclovir wellbutrin sr 75mg climax amoxicillin levitra femme lioresal nuspojave bactrim induced kidney injury azithromycin 3 days viagra for stroke patients propranolol t1 2









Saudi Reforms, Saudi Crackdowns

By Jamie Glazov

FrontPageMagazine.com | November 7, 2003


See especially the policy prescriptions at the end of this article

Saudi Arabia's rulers are now paying lip-service to supporting an experiment with a Gorbachev-like program of Perestroika and Glasnost. But are they serious? If they are, why did they recently crackdown on reform demonstrators? And if the political system were to be "opened up," wouldn't there be a danger that Taliban-like fanatics would just gain more power? Moreover, what does Saudi "reform" even mean if the Saudis continue to foment their hate against America and Israel in their mosques and classrooms? And what policy should the Bush administration be pursuing toward these Saudi realities?


To discuss these and other aspects regarding Saudi Arabia today, Frontpage Symposium is joined by Khalid Al-Dakhil, an assistant professor of political sociology at King Saud University in Saudi Arabia. He has been a columnist for London's Al Hayat newspaper and is now a visiting fellow at the Carnegie Endowment in DC; Andrew Apostolou, Director of Research at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, a policy institute created after 9/11 and focusing on terrorism; Laurent Murawiec, Laurent Murawiec, a former Seniolr Rand Corp. analyst  is now a Senior Fellow with the Hudson Institute. His book on Saudi Arabia, "Taking Saudi out of Arabia" ["La Guerre d'apres"] came out last month in Paris; and Kenneth R. Timmerman, an investigative reporter and author who has spent twenty years reporting on Europe and the Middle East. His latest book, Preachers of Hate: Islam and the War on America, raises serious questions about Saudi government funding of terror and Saudi funding of radical Wahhabi preachers and schools that are training new generations of Muslims to hate Jews and hate America. He is also the author of Shakedown: Exposing the Real Jesse Jackson, and The Death Lobby: How the West Armed Iraq, and writes regularly for Insight Magazine. Information on his latest book and recent articles are available at preachersofhate.com;


Interlocutor: Welcome gentlemen to Frontpage Symposium. It is a pleasure to have you here. Let's begin with this question: Are the recently announced Saudi "reforms" credible? And if there is going to be a successful "reform movement" in Saudi Arabia, is it going to be led by Saudis wanting more democracy, or by fanatics who want more Talibanization?


Al-Dakhil: The first part of your question assumes that the announced reforms are unprecedented. Well, they are not. There were such reform before, I mean municipal election, as far back as 1965. And what was announced few weeks ago was simply a revival of a law that was decreed by the late king Khalid in 1979. That law was about administrative and legal reforms at the municipal level. So on that basis, it could easily be said that the announced reforms are credible indeed. But, the real question should be about whether this announcement is the beginning of a real and comprehensive reform plan that would include political, economic, and constitutional reforms? Or simply another attempt at going back to the old game of starting something, then leaving it suffocate under the laws of bureaucracy and time.




The second part of the question is loaded and suggestive, as so many things that are being said about Saudi Arabia in the US capital these days. Not all religious oriented people are like Taliban. And it should be stressed here that Taliban belong to a different Islamic school of law, i.e. the Hanafi school, from the one followed by the majority in Saudi Arabia, i.e. the Hanbali school. I expect us to go back to this later on during our dialogue.


I don't expect the fanatics to win the election in Saudi Arabia. However, it's almost certain that the conservatives, both from the religious and the tribal circles, will dominate such elections. This is natural and expected, considering that the society has been exposed for so long to one perspective, i.e., the conservative religious perspective. But then, there's nothing wrong with the conservative wining the election. After all, election and freedom is for all, and not only for the liberals and the progressives. The most important is to start the reform, institute freedom of expression and pluralism. That way the society's floor will be opened to different point views, and the people will be exposed to more than one discourse. After that they'll have more than one choice to make. 


Apostolou: The just announced proposed changes, one hesitates to call them "reforms", are a belated regime response to internal and external pressure. There was a similar response following the 1991 Gulf War. The question that one has to ask is what does the ruling family want to get out of these changes? It is rather unlikely that they want to emancipate their subjects and turn them into citizens. Indeed, it is implausible that the ruling family, which is rather like a vast, sprawling conglomerate, would surrender any real power. It is more likely that they want to co-opt elements of the population that they fear may move from indifference towards opposition.


There are various currents of opposition calling for change in Saudi Arabia and there has long been opposition to the ruling family. These currents of opinion are diverse, fractious and in some rather famous cases, more extreme than the clerical establishment which provides religious legitimacy to the ruling regime. How strong these currents are, however, is hard to tell given how closed Saudi Arabia is to even the people who live there, let alone outsiders. Political trends within society, let alone the ruling family, are difficult to get a handle on.




It is also worth remembering that it was Saudi Arabia which helped to fund and train the Taliban (Pakistan provided manpower, military support and training, the UAE made a cash contribution), so arguably the Taliban went through "Saudi-isation". Al-Qaida, which is now attacking targets in Saudi Arabia, therefore counts as a "returned export" rather than an "import".


Timmerman: I would go even further than Andrew Apostolou. There was not merely a "Saudiasation" of the Taliban; the Taliban where a Saudi creation. They were educated at madrassas in Pakistan that had been built with Saudi money and were staffed with wahhabi clerics sent on mission by the Saudi government. While in power, their regime was propped up by non-stop deliveries of Saudi wheat and Saudi cash. (I witnessed one of those convoys blocking the border beyond Peshawar in March 1998; it stretched more than a mile long, bumper to bumper).

The Saudis modeled the system they set up in Pakistan to train the Taliban on their own state-run schools. The Saudi national Education Policy doctrine, translated recently by the Center for Monitoring the Impact of Peace, states that "the purpose of education is understanding Islam correctly and completely, implanting and spreading the Islamic faith, providing the student with Islamic values, instructions and ideals…" Among those Islamic values is "jihad," the doctrine states. "Jihad in God's cause is a firm religious duty, a norm to be followed and an existing necessity. It is to continue [so] until the Day of Resurrection."

It will be very difficult, if not impossible, for "reformers" to emerge from within the Saudi system until the Saudis reform the school system that continues to teach hatred of Jews, hatred of Western values and hatred of the West as its basic values. In fifth grade, students are given this "yes-no" quiz:

¤ "The religion of Islam is the path that leads to Paradise."

¤ The other religions destroy their followers."

In ninth grade, students are taught, "There is no doubt that the Muslims' power irritate the infidels and spread envy in the hearts of the enemies of Islam &endash; Christians, Jews and others… a malicious Crusader-Jewish alliance [is] striving to eliminate Islam from all the continents."

Dramatic changes in the Saudi school curricula should be the first measure of the credibility of any reform. Why have we never heard the Saudis even mention this?

Murawiec: It is the umpteenth time that "reforms" are announced. Take none of it seriously. It is a useful rabbit to take out of the royal hat every time the outside world has to be impressed. Periodically the alcoholic announces that he intends to reform himself. The al-Saud are addicted to power and its perks and the wealth it gives them. Going cold turkey is not something the regime is able, let alone willing to do. The gullibility of foreigners makes that talk into headlines. In 1975 municipal elections were announced. Today they're talking of electing half the councils in 14 municipalities…


The al-Saud-Wahhabi nexus has created a monstrous creature, as an extension of itself: decades of brainwashing of youth to a doctrine that is inherently nihilistic, that preaches enmity toward and destruction of "apostates and schismatics" (Shiites) "apes and pigs" (Christians and Jews), hatred for the West. The doctrine and the associated practices have not remained internal but have been massively exported. As a result, what is happening inside Saudi Arabia has ceased to be an internal Saudi affair: it is an urgent danger for the world. Since the Saudi regime is Talibans with oil - the Talibans were Saudis without oil -   there is a serious danger. If need be it should be pre-empted. The al-Saud-Wahhabi nexus has taken over most Sunni extremist (fundamentalist, revivalist) movements in the world over the last few decades: Moslem Brotherhood, Deobandi, Tablighi, etc. What matters is not whether they are Hanafi or Hanbali, but that they have been "Wahhabized."


If we're talking reform, the reintroduction of the three other major Sunni madhdhab in Mecca and of the Shiites should be a priority. Moslem pluralism sounds like a good beginning. It was the case from time immemorial and was only abolished, in blood and violence, in 1925, when ibn Saud and the Ikhwan conquered Hijaz.


Democracy is not a matter of elections. Elections are the crowning, last chapter of democratic development. Rule of law, equality for all, legal and civil rights, transparent governance, accountability of those who hold office &endash; that's what begins democracy. Saddam's Iraq, Assad's Syria, Mubarak's Egypt have had plenty of elections &endash; a sham.




Interlocutor: So if the announced reforms are just a sham, the crackdown really shouldn't be a surprise, right? What exactly was the scope of the crackdown anyway?


Al-Dakhil: Demonstrations are prohibited by law in Saudi Arabia. So crackdowns should be expected by a regime that is not used to the idea of the people going out to demonstrate as a way of expressing their views and grievances. As to the scope, it seems to be big. Official figures of those who were arrested is put at more than 150. Unofficial figures is much more than that.


Apostolou: The structure of Saudi politics is an ongoing crackdown. North Korea is sometimes referred to as the "Hermit Kingdom". The same could be said of Saudi Arabia, a country largely closed to outside analysts and whose political system is opaque. There is always repression in Saudi Arabia. Arguably what defines a "crackdown" is when the regime goes after genuinely dangerous people and publicizes its pursuit of these extremists. During late 2001 and 2002 the attitude towards Saudi nationals returning from Afghanistan was lax. Many were briefly detained and interrogated, too few remained in jail.




Murawiec: The al-Saud don't like to lose face: they did with the Riyadh explosions. They did with the recent demonstration. It is a totalitarian society tempered by tribalism. So they crack down. The problem is that, beyond the street extremists, they would have to arrest themselves. Prince Nayef, prince Sultan, Prince Turki, to name but a few very senior members of the royal family, have been involved at the highest level in the establishment, the sustenance and the action of terrorist organizations. The feedback loop has been reaching Arabia ever since Turki's protégé bin Laden first returned from Afghanistan. Note also that there is a continuum rather than a gap between the regime and their "opponents." Arab politics is never simple. Saudi affairs are never wysiwyg. You'll see an opponent, a dissenting faction, maintaining contact with and receiving support from some senior member of the Royals or a member of his Majlis.


There is a proper context to assess all that: the succession struggle. Who will be king, who wil be crown prince, who will be next in line? Understand, none of the contenders if "pro-American" or "anti," they're only pro-al Saud, and they play the American card as opportunity dictates. But the succession is played like succession struggles in closed societies, late Soviet Union or last years of Mao: never look at the face of the conjuror, look at his hands and fingers. It is now the various shows that matter, what happens on the front-stage of the theater, but the backstage maneuvering, negotiations, back-stabbings, etc. The family is coming down the wire. All major factions have tried to postpone crucial decisions in the hope of gathering more factional power, more allies, and position themselves better. Time is running out. We should expect more eruptions, none of which will be dictated by "popular" sentiment, all of which will be the expression of court and clan factions.


Timmerman: Khalid al-Dakhil is right: why should we be surprised if the Saudis arrest rural clerics who might stir up the population against their rule &endash; especially when those clerics are Shias, whom they consider as "heretics"? More significant would be the replacement of government clerics such as Sheikh Saad al Buraik, who raised $109 million last year for the families of suicide bombers and had this to say on Saudi state television: "I am against America until this life ends, until the Day of Judgment… O Muslim Ummah, don't take the Jews and Christians as allies." (p119-120, Preachers of Hate).

Interlocutor: Fair enough gentlemen, but hasn't there been some kind of general "shift,"  or an "evolution," in Saudi policies? 

Dakhil: The question is so general that I'm not sure what you mean; internal or foreign policies. If what you have in mind is the internal policy, then I would say that there are signs that a shift or an evolution is about to take place. The crown prince, Abdullah Ibn Abdul-Aziz, is talking about expanding political participation. And it is significant to note here that he is the first in the ruling family, and in such a high position, to ever use the expression "political participation". Education is being reformed. Promises have been made to go beyond municipal elections. These are a mixed bag of promises and signs on the one hand, and real steps on the ground, on the other. However, considering the fact that the society on the basis of which the state was created is different now in many ways than what it use to be in the past, and considering the challenges the Saudis are facing now, both internal external, makes political shifts, or reforms the only option available.

Apostolou: It took the al-Qaida attacks in May for the ruling family to recognize that they have a terrorism problem. Until then, they thought that they only had a PR problem. Americans, having suffered 3,000 casualties courtesy of the Saudi terrorism problem, thought otherwise.

Until these attacks the measures taken to curb both incitement to terrorism and the funding of terrorism were largely geared towards appeasing the US. The perception within the kingdom was, accurately, that the terrorism is a threat to others. The ruling family knows that it has to change in some way, but is unsure what to do. After all, it does not want to lose its control of power and wealth. We have had hints of possible change coming out of the ruling family in the past and they have always come to very little.

Timmerman: Andrew Apostolou is right, in my view, to emphasize the importance of the Riyadh bombings this May. The Saudis claimed the bombings created a popular backlash against al Qaeda, and helped dry up recruitment. They also claim they prompted the government to take a hard look at their approach toward terror. But we have very few windows into the hearts and minds of ordinary Saudis other than what the Saudi government wants to provide us, and this should give us pause, especially as the Saudi media and Saudi schools continue to preach a doctrine of hate &endash; hatred of Jews, hatred of Christians, hatred of all those who do not embrace their militant faith.

Murawiec: Change? Dunes change every day as the wind dictates. In closed systems, like totalitarian regimes, biology is the prime factor of direct change - King Fahd is clinically dead but not politically. Pressures mount from within and from without. The al-Saud are poorly able to perceive pressures (everything is a threat) and to adjust and adapt - their modus operandi is to buy, cajole, threaten, arrest, torture, kill - not to devise new policies.

While the art of survival has been the only conspicuous talent of the al-Sauds (with consumption, I hasten to add), I wonder if they haven't entered what ibn Khaldun calls the "fourth [dynastic] generation" which squanders the legacy of its forebears - except that doom would come with the fourth king, not even the fourth generation.


Interlocutor: Ok, so what do we make of the reported nuclear deals and ambitions the Saudis are engaged in? They are brewing trouble aren't they?

Murawiec: Saudi Arabia has been pursuing a nuclear option for years. The kingdom desires nukes all the more urgently that the 60-year window of partnership with the U.S. is closing. The royals want nukes to acquire a strategic immunity &endash; which they once enjoyed under the American umbrella. They funded both Saddam's nuclear program, pre-1991, and Pakistan. Their "buy me a country" policy concerned Pakistan in the first place, since Ali Bhutto and Zia ul-Haq. The "Islamic Bomb" Islamabad bragged of was the financial offspring of Riyad. The transfer of designs, technologies and material both in the nuclear and in the ballistic sectors have been intense between China, North Korea, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia &endash; it all started with the sale of China's Silkworm missiles to Saudi Arabia. Both Pakistan's nuclear and ballistic programs have been godfathered by the Saudis. Crown Prince Abdullah's mid-October state visit was concerned with this in priority. 


Timmerman: Already in the mid-1980s, Saudi Arabia, with U.S. help, began building a series of deep underground bases that were designed to withstand a nuclear attack. From Communist China, the Saudis purchased long-range missiles capable of carrying a nuclear warhead. In both cases, the Saudis claimed they were responding to a threat from the Islamic Republic of Iran. That is what they are doing today. The Saudi response to Iran's nuclear weapons ambitions should demonstrate the extraordinary folly of the Non-proliferation Treaty, which in essence legitimates and even enhances clandestine nuclear weapons development in aspiring nuclear weapons states by encouraging the nuclear powers to transfer technology to them behind the fig leaf of civilian nuclear cooperation. As every nuclear engineer, physicist and weapons designer I have ever interviewed has told me, shifting from civilian nuclear power to nuclear weapons is like crossing the street with the light. It is time to impose far more draconian controls on all nuclear technology transfers than those that currently exist.

Apostolou: The Saudis are interested in a nuclear option for obvious reasons (Patrick Clawson at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy has written well on this matter). They do not, however, appear to be particularly advanced towards such a capability. They have potential delivery systems but nothing to deliver. There has been speculation that Pakistan would hand Saudi Arabia a bomb if it needed it and the irresponsible way in which Pakistan behaves with its nuclear technology gives credibility to such speculation. Much will depend on how the EU and IAEA deal with Iran in coming months. My personal suspicion is that they will, at best, delay the Iranian programme, but no more. In the meantime, one expects that the Saudis will consider other options, such as repairing their relations with the US. Despite the problems in Saudi-US relations, Saudi Arabia needs the US to be its security guarantor. The Saudi desire to have that guarantee reaffirmed gives the US important leverage which it should use.

Interlocutor: In terms of everything I am hearing from you gentlemen, it looks like Saudi Arabia is our enemy. The heavy indoctrination of the Saudi youth by the Mullas preaching hate for Americans, Jews, and all things Western is evidence enough. What kind of friends are these?

Murawiec: the essential point is that nothing and nobody can split or separate Wahhabi from al-Saud. They have been business and clanic-family partners since the mid-18th century! Wahhabi ideology is intrinsic to the power of the al-Saud, the might of the al-Saud the key to the survival and spread of Wahhabism. The doctrine itself is a backward, desert-bound, simplistic mish-mash of pagan mores and practices with Islamic slogans. It is intrinsically a violent and ruthlessly-bigoted doctrine. This is reflected in the sermons, the schoolbooks, the fatwas and juridico-religious debates in the kingdom. The al-Saud-Wahhabi nexus has a layered view of a divinely-ordered hierarchy of beings: the worst are the Chiite "apostates and schismatics," the Jews are just an inch above, below Christians who are hated. Non-Wahhabi Moslems are not much above, all of them way down the food chain on top of which the Saudi Royals have established their seats. The West is inherently an enemy to be destroyed. In the Bedouin way of war, you only wage battle if and when you can win it. Otherwise, bid your time and strike as soon as you may. Infidels anew to be destroyed. Some friends.

Timmerman: The United States is walking a tightrope in our relations with the Saudi royal family. To one side, we see the criminal behavior of senior Saudi princes, who sponsor the preachers of hate, export Wahhabism, and who in some cases continue to provide financial support to Osama Bin Laden and to the network of charities and commercial entities that feed him. On the other, lies Bin Laden himself. The Saudis like to remind us that what comes after them is far worse. While that may be true, the Saudis have consciously created the swamps that lie on either side of the tightrope. I detail in Preachers of Hate how the Saudis, starting with King Fahd in person, made a pact with the devil starting in 1979 to export wahhabism around the world in order to protect them from the wahhabis at home. As part of that pact, they have failed to educate their population, or instill in them the values that would allow them to navigate the modern world as responsible (and peaceful) citizens. They have failed to create a middle class of skilled professionals; they have failed to empower half of their population (women). Indeed, for all their hundreds of billions of dollars in oil revenues since 1979, the Saudi royal family have failed to create a single monument to civilization, unless you count pleasure palace King Fahd has built on the French Riviera near Monaco that is so vast it takes a commercial jet five full minutes to fly beyond it.

Apostolou: Many countries indoctrinate schoolchildren with varying degrees of success. By contrast, in Britain, we attempt to bore children to death in school. So why does indoctrination in Saudi Arabia matter to the US? The answer is because it has helped to fuel terrorism and encourages people to fund terrorism. It is not just that 15 of the 19 September 11 hijackers were Saudi nationals, but that around half of the 660 inmates of Guantanamo Bay are also Saudi nationals. The problem we have, however, is that indoctrination alone does not lead to terrorism. After all, some millions have been exposed to the sort of inflammatory and chauvinistic ideas that Americans have now realized are part of a Saudi education, but the number of terrorists is in the thousands. The population of Saudi Arabia is around 22 million (5 million foreigners, 17 million Saudi nationals), of which probably 20% is composed of native males under the age of 15. The implication of the incitement argument is that there are 3.4 million potential terrorists being bred. If that is the case, then our problems have only just begun. Similarly, it is worth remembering that while Saudi Arabia sells many tens of billions of dollars of oil each year, the amount of money that finds its way from Saudi nationals to terrorists is in the millions (for the sake of argument, if Saudi Arabia exports 8m b/d for $25/b, that is $73 billion per annum. Al-Qaida's annual budget before September 11 was estimated at some $30 million, some of which did not come from Saudi sources). Most of this money comes from individuals, some of whom are readily identifiable.

What the US therefore needs to do is to make its relationship with Saudi Arabia contingent upon specific and verifiable reforms: ending incitement and religious chauvinism sponsored by the state, a programme of serious interdiction of financing for terrorism, an end to the variable and sometimes "kid gloves" treatment handed out to terrorists. Non-Americans have additional concerns. The Middle East has suffered from the way in which Saudi Arabia uses its money to encourage intolerance and to stifle debate: whether it is the support for the families of terrorists who murder Israelis, the encouragement of extremists in Algeria or the buying up of the Arabic press in London. The US should certainly push for such alterations in Saudi behaviour, but US allies in the Middle East will also have to pipe up. All such measures will assist in the war against terrorism, but they will not be the "magic bullet" that defeats terrorism.

Interlocutor: Tomorrow Colin Powell resigns for some reason and you are appointed Secretary of State. In your first meeting with the President, he tells you that you two are the Nixon-Kissinger duo part II. He wants to mould a brilliant foreign policy toward Saudi Arabia and to manipulate it to help win the War on Terror. He asks you the first basic steps he should start taking. What do you say?

Timmerman: First, Mr. President, we must be clear about the origins of terror. Terror does not draw its powerful attraction from poverty and underdevelopment, despite what the French say (they could give two hoots about poverty and underdevelopment &endash; but that's another story). Terror has sprung like a vine from roots plunged deep into a sewer of hate. We cannot just pull up the vine, Mr. President. We have to empty the sewer.

The Saudi royal family is the main sponsor of this sewer of hate, by nurturing and financing a radical vision of Islam which uses Jew-hatred and the hatred of Western values to destroy the rational minds of the young. When your enemies are the "sons of monkeys and pigs," as the Saudis and their friends in Gaza, Jerusalem, Cairo and Damascus preach every Friday, it becomes much easier to murder them. Oh, and by the way: in the minds of these preachers of hate, we are all Jews, so there is no escaping their fate. 

Our goal, Mr. President, should be nothing less than to spark a reformation within the world of Islam; just repeating that Islam is a "religion of peace" that has been "hijacked by murderers" is not enough. The Saudis can either take the lead in the reformation, as the Custodians of the Two Holy mosques, or they can be beaten by it. That is the choice you should put to them.

You must make clear that there is no middle ground in the war on terror. If the Saudis want to be with us, they must: 1) cut off funding to the preachers of hate, both inside the Kingdom and abroad, 2) change the curricula in their schools to reflect a reformed vision of Islam as a "religion of peace" for the living, not an appeal to the peace of the graveyard, 3) close down the so-called "Islamic banks" that are financing Bin Laden and his ilk, 4) confiscate the assets of the princes and non-royal families who have provided financial assistance to Bin Laden.

Yes, you can make this pitch quietly by inviting Crown Prince Abdallah to the ranch &endash;once. But you must make clear, Mr. President, that these are not subjects of discussion. These are demands. And there must be clear deadlines.

Prince Abdallah will complain that he must have something to take back to his people to make them swallow this hard pill (such as putting "pressure" on Israel). Here you must be inflexible. He should be happy to keep his throne. This is the price for that. You should remind him that the modern, moderate representative government we have helped build in Iraq could serve as a natural attraction to the Shias of Saudi Arabia's eastern province. If he doesn't get the hint, try these words: the Republic of Aramco.

And as far as the Middle East peace "process" goes, Mr. President: If you decide to use all the tools at our disposal (such as making money vanish as it is being wired into the wrong bank accounts), that poor excuse for university sinecures and State Department diplomacy will join the graveyard of bad ideas where it belongs.

There is one serious downside to pursuing this policy you must consider, however: it will generate massive unemployment in the ranks of the State Department Arabists. Maybe that's why they have never proposed a serious policy that is in America's interest to you before.


Murawiec: Sxteen months ago, I told exactly that to the Defense Policy Board, and the Washington Post featured it one month later. I've developed it in my book La Guerre d'après which just appeared in Paris: we need to issue a detailed ultimatum to the Saudis. If there are any "Gorbachevs" in the royal family, let them stand up and be counted. If the terms of our ultimatum are obeyed, it will be a giant step forward in the War on Terrorism &endash; finances, propaganda, indoctrination, logistics, cadres, Saudi intel, etc. If not, the very logic of the War is that we tackle the Saudi royals, very rudely. But one thing needs to be clear: the time for finessing and being oh! so clever with the Saudis is over. They don't get it. You're either top dog or low dog. Let's not try to "manipulate" them: let's roll.


Apostolou: Sorry, but I am not a US citizen and my current visa does not permit me to take government employment.


Interlocutor: Ok Mr. Apostolou, but when you can take employment you better get in touch with me for a new symposium on this subject. In any case, thank you Mr. Apostolou, and thank you Kenneth Timmerman, Laurent Murawiec and Khalid Al-Dakhil. It was a honor to have all of you here with us. Take care for now.


I welcome all of our readers to get in touch with me if they have a good idea for a symposium. Email me at jglazov@rogers.com



Islamic Anti-Semitism. Guests: Kenneth R. Timmerman, Bat Ye'or, Walid Phares and Robert Spencer

Pakistan -- Friend or Foe? Guests: Timothy D. Hoyt, Walid Phares, Alex Alexiev, Esam Sohail.

The Muslim Persecution of Christians. Guests: Bat Ye'or, Paul Marshall, Habib Malik and Walid Phares.

What About Syria? Guests: Alex Alexiev, Nir Boms, Bassam Haddad and David Kaiser.

Original article



Upcoming Media events

From the author of the national best-seller, Shakedown!



Like no other book before it, Preachers of Hate uncovers an ancient hatred that threatens the life and livelihood of every American.

The "new" anti-Semitism targets not only Jews, but Americans.

It targets our values, our lifestyle, and our freedoms.

Middle East Data Project, Inc.,

7831 Woodmont Ave - Suite 395ßßß

Bethesda, MD 20814

E-mail ktimmer@bellatlantic.net